Mortimer, please use the talk page of the pages before making substantial edits of this proportion. You have experienced something rather troublesome with Kwigon for those edits, and as he thinks you're a vandal, it is very much likely he will not cease the undoes until you give up or something else happens. I'm pretty much certain you are not a vandal, as you even took your time to explain the changes, however, please avoid a ruckus if possible.
-- Maverick the hunter 11:34, 1 April 2007 (PDT)
Warlock Mortimer, please do not edit pages without providing a useful "summary." Because of the dispute over your edits, it has become very difficult to verify anything you have updated recently on this wiki, and it has produced a large amount of work for myself and other wiki editors.
Also, regardless of who is correct, edit wars can be considered vandalism, and you may be blocked from editing this wiki because of them. From now on, always explain and justify your edits. If there is a disagreement over something, DO NOT continue to edit the page... wait until an agreement or compromise is reached on the Talk page.
Consider this your only warning for this type of action. If you continue to disrupt this wiki, you will be blocked from editing.
-- Braccae tuae aperiuntur
-- -- 07:29, 2 April 2007 (PDT)
I do not want another edit war occuring so i think it would be best if you provide some proofs of high creature hits and damages. Specifically do this by linking to your own screen shots of these hits, on something like photobucket, or possibly a tibicam, but screenshots are preferable. This way the mess can be cleared. Any questions just ask.
--DM ><((°> Contribs <°))>< talk to me 20:18, 22 April 2007 (PDT)
-- Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes
-- -- 07:06, 23 April 2007 (PDT)
Again you are doing Ramdom edits. You are a Noob or just not careful if you change a monster atack plz update the max damage too, also i think whas you who changed Jugernaut boulder damage from 800 to 500 now you make it 590 it does not make any sence, also if you remove that a monster cant use invisible remove it from the notes too, also use the summary to say what are you doing and why. I still think you are just a vandal so do good changes or you going to get banned from this wiki again.
Ancient Scarab weakness
Hi there! I saw your comment about 1.9% weaker than scarabs. I've tested some scarabs and I think they are 18% weak to fire, which means ancient scarabs are still 20%. I'm not 100% sure about this (which is why I haven't changed it), but it fits into my damage formula.
Nevaran 19:17, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
On your edit on medusa, monster don't do X4 attacks? You mean 4 hits in one turn? Monsters don't do that anymore, spam was removed on another update long time ago.
--Kwigon the sharpshooter 22:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Is not that you laing about the monsters attacks, is that you don't test them well enough. You have to A: be armor naked to test melee attacks, Don't confuse melee+life drain combos as 1 attack, and go in person yourself to fight them and let them hit you. You doing the same with the medusa page as you did in the past with GS, Banshee, and other monsters where you where wrong, and am sure you didn't go to those monsters to test in person before undoing the edits X4 times.
--Kwigon the sharpshooter 23:38, 28 July 2009 (UTC)