TibiaWiki
Advertisement

Welcome

Feel free to discuss things among admins. Ask things to admins, propose new ideas etc. Reporting a vandal can also be perfectly done here, but is not really the intention of this page. Also note that this page doesn't have the same function as TibiaWiki talk:Community Portal.


Revamp - Template:Infobox Item

Hi guys,

Here's my first installment of a huge restructuring of our templates:

  • User:Sixorish/Item2
  • User:Sixorish/Item2/Axe (compare: Axe)
  • User:Sixorish/Item2/Pair of Soft Boots (compare: Pair of Soft Boots)

These templates are subject to change. I'm open to any suggestions.

-- Sixorish (talk) 07:37, January 11, 2015 (UTC)


I definately like the better way of using horizontal space, but I must admit it takes some time to find each piece of info (obviously because they are placed in a different spot and I'm not used to this). Do I have to reload css, because I see almost no layout atm? -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 12:48, January 11, 2015 (UTC)


I can't imagine why the CSS wouldn't load for you. Here's what you should see:

The key features are:

  • Short key/value pairs are displayed in a table to the right. This allows more space for the other content, like notes, to flow around it.
  • Trade tables are displayed alongside each other. I think this is very important because currently you have to check the label, whereas people will eventually get a feel for buyfrom/sellto based on its position (left or right).
  • It uses more logical structure/elements. I think this is important because search engines will treat our content differently depending on the elements we use in our pages.

With all that said, I'm not an experienced web designer. I think the structure of the page is better but I don't have a good feel for what looks good and is intuitive to use. I got feedback from my friends and adjusted it until they were tired of telling me they didn't like it. I don't know if they genuinely hated it or if they were too adapted to the current layout which we've had for years. What I do know is: the current layout is inadequate, outdated, and doesn't address our needs since we've moved to Wikia (and began using their skin). -- Sixorish (talk) 14:12, January 11, 2015 (UTC)


I agree with your friends that it could use improvement, but this already is definitely way better than what we use now. -- Wouterboy (talk) 14:26, January 11, 2015 (UTC)


I agree that it is better use of space and it will take time to get used to. If you plan to try a few different layouts then we should do a poll to see which is most useful/appealing.
Besides structure my biggest concern would be that we still have a lot of information available. Your Soft Boots example currently does not have the classes/types, transferable, implemented version date, the tables for Boots and all Items, and maybe a few others. I know these can be added in anytime but i was curious if you left them out intentionally or not. I prefer to maintain all info but they do not need to be in the same structure, necessarily.
Side note that this reminded me of: At some point i want to add a basic template or update the current one for the Update/X.XX pages and redo the main Update page with a table using said template.
--DM ><((°> Contribs <°))>< talk to me 21:52, January 11, 2015 (UTC)


Thanks I added transferable and classification rows in the table. I decided not to include itemclass because primarytype implies (or is meant to imply) itemclass. The template could still use it 'behind the scenes' of course. However, maybe something to think about later is a change to the classifications, because they don't always have a shared concept ("Plants, Animal Products, Food and Drink" is a valid itemclass, when its name is just a list of all constituents...)

Another thing: this change will involve templating the droppedby parameter. I think this is the best way to go because it would enforce a standard to be used within the templates. This is the best option for creating a list instead of formatted links, other methods would involve complex string functions which gets hairy and is harder to use/maintain.

Also this new layout should be easier to adapt to changes, like mobile devices and skin adjustments. I thought Wikia was enabling a fluid layout on all wikis but that doesn't seem to have happened. If it does, we'll at least be more able to adapt to it.

-- Sixorish (talk) 08:12, January 12, 2015 (UTC)


I have the feeling you're in the right way, Six. Nice job so far! I'll try to catch you online.

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 09:03, January 12, 2015 (UTC)


With Dragoes' help I have changed some of the styles. Please check the pages again and tell me what you think. The blue background seems to have made a huge difference. -- Sixorish (talk) 13:16, January 12, 2015 (UTC)


Looks A LOT better now, I'm starting to like it. Some questions:

  • What do you mean with "status: active"? That it is obtainable in game and not unobtainable or deprecated or from an event?
  • bought for has two dashes, shouldn't that be converted to something else (I think we have something else in the current template), some text I mean.
  • The text in the dropped by box is considerably larger than the other text, I don't like that (it gives emphasis, which is not needed or wanted)
  • also about the dropped by, what about the loot statistics data? Will the percent values be visible later on? (I imagine this javascript is set to an id/class you don't use currently).
  • I would like a background color behind the properties table to the right. Borders and/or background colors give structure to a page. It should be easy to distinguish the different blocks of information.
  • Maybe also a little background color (rounded) to the headers. Or a border bottom.

-- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 13:39, January 12, 2015 (UTC)


  • Yes, status will mean just that - if it's obtainable, if it's deprecated, or if it's a TS feature (like Test Server Assistant).
  • I'll remove that.
  • Yes the JS will need to be adjusted to account for the new structure. I'll look into that when the template is finalized/agreed on.
  • I've tried a few different colors but I can't find one that fits. I think the bold property names distinguish the table from the rest of the content.
  • I'll add a gold border to the bottom of each section header. However, I don't think any color really complements gold well to use as a background color.

-- Sixorish (talk) 14:49, January 12, 2015 (UTC)


Some ideas we had:
For items:

  • Add the following parameters:
    • pickupable (binary parameter; so we can merge Template:Infobox Item and Template:Infobox Object);
    • walkable (binary parameter);
    • market (binary parameter);
    • axeMod, clubMod, distMod, mlMod, swordMod, shieldMod, speedMod (skill modifiers);
    • immobile (binary parameter; if yes, diplay Moveable: no);
    • walkingspeed (% of base speed; for floors);
    • height, width (1=32px);
    • blocksmissile (binary parameter);
    • blockspath (binary parameter);
    • holdsliquid (binary parameter);
    • hangable (binary parameter);
    • rotatable (binary or 2/4?);
    • floorchange (binary parameter);
    • ingameheight (height value);
    • spriteID (to detect items sharing the same sprite);
    • effect (effect name; if an item displays an effect when used ingame, this info should be on the item page);
    • readable (binary parameter);
    • rewritable (binary parameter);
    • decaytime;
    • decayedfrom (item name);
    • decaysto (item name);
    • changesto (item name; if an item changes into another when "used");
    • displaytime (binary parameter; items that display Tibian time when "used").
  • Only display npcprice, npcvalue, stackable, transferable, value and weight if pickupable = yes;
  • Only display changesto, decaytime, decayedfrom, decaysto, destructable, displaytime, floorchange, hangable, holdsliquid, ingameheight, rotatable, walkingspeed, writable and skill modifiers if corresponding values exist;
  • Only display blocksmissile, blockspath, immobile and walkable values if pickupable = no;
  • Review all existing strings on attributes field and create new parameters;
  • Currently, attributes is displayed in parentheses after item name, this should be reviewed.

For monsters:

  • Add the following parameters:
    • blood (blood type: Fire, Poison, Bones, Blood?);
    • corpse (corpse name);
    • raceNumber;
    • outfit;
    • pushCreatures (binary parameter);
    • seeInvisible (binary parameter);
    • lifeDrainImmune (binary parameter);
    • paralyzeImmune (binary parameter);
    • rewardSystem (binary parameter).

For NPCs:

  • Add the following parameters:
    • outfit (in addition to race);
    • radius.

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 15:24, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

We can automatically add many of these parameters on pages that have an ID. Therefore, we should add ID parameter to the remaining items and to objects (this one might be tricky).
Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 02:32, January 13, 2015 (UTC)

--- Check out table headers which are links, like on Boat. The blue links are barely readable in contrast with the blue headers. --DM ><((°> Contribs <°))>< talk to me 03:29, January 13, 2015 (UTC)


Thanks. I changed the link text on the table headers. -- Sixorish (talk) 07:51, January 13, 2015 (UTC)


Loot% on items and creatures should be working, but it depends on JS wgTitle (e.g. Axe vs. Sixorish/Item2/Axe) so it will not work on those pages until they go live.

Here's what will change:

The pages that will be changed are:

Other templates will be untouched for now. I'd like it if the item template could support objects so I have avoided them for the time being.

Are there any objections to this? If there are no objections I will work on a script to make all necessary changes before the templates can be used. The templates still need some edits to accommodate for transclusion but otherwise they are done.

-- Sixorish (talk) 13:15, January 16, 2015 (UTC)


I agree with the technical changes and I think the overall layout of the new templates looks good. Some minor tweaks in colors/layout are still possible, but that can be done in a later stage as well. Some remaining questions:

  • The sidebar disappeared, as well as the creatureclass or itemclass templates. Is that intended?
  • I'm a bit scared people will be mad about the change, is there anything we can do about that? Warn people a change is coming and ask for feedback? Do a poll, give the community a feeling they have a say? I don't know.

-- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 16:53, January 16, 2015 (UTC)


Yes there probably will be a bit of negativity, just because it's a change and nobody likes change. With that said I don't think a poll will be representative of the layout's value, because everyone will vote that they don't like it without considering the possible advantages of the change. Besides, we'd have to alter the main page for a poll because any other page will get very little attention.

But of course we should ask for the users' feedback. I'll work on TibiaWiki:Projects/2015 Layout Revamp so that we can link to it in the news and ask them to post feedback on the talk page. Other than that I don't see what we can do to get good feedback on the layout. -- Sixorish (talk) 08:56, January 17, 2015 (UTC)

Oh and the sidebar is removed because that was taking up a lot of space where we didn't want that. If we decide that pages need it, we can create a list on the bottom similar to the 'dropped by' list (3-4 columns). Personally, I almost never care for "related monsters" but maybe less experienced people might, I don't know. -- Sixorish (talk) 09:29, January 17, 2015 (UTC)


I've added {{Navigation}} to the bottom of the Creature2 template and adjusted the styles a bit. Let me know if it's acceptable or any improvements that can be made. Example: User:Sixorish/Creature2/Hellgorak. -- Sixorish (talk) 17:37, January 19, 2015 (UTC)


I will start converting creatures to the new system tomorrow if there are no objections. I'd like to get this done before February because I'll have a lot less time to work on big projects. -- Sixorish (talk) 02:58, January 20, 2015 (UTC)


Yes, go ahead. Apparently there is no feedback. -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 08:50, January 20, 2015 (UTC)


Today I used User:SixBot to convert all of the items and creatures to use {{Sound List}}. Items and creatures might look a little odd with the sound spacing until the infobox changes are applied. Tomorrow I will edit NPCs and apply the infobox changes. Then I'll work on a script to convert the loot and droppedby of creatures and items. Hopefully it will all be done before the 24th. -- Sixorish (talk) 15:42, January 20, 2015 (UTC)


I apologize. I forgot to log in my bot account before running the script so about 1/3 NPC edits were attributed to this account and they will show on the recent changes. Anyway I've edited all NPCs to convert the sounds, which means all pages should be using {{Sound List}} within their sounds parameters. What's left to do:

-- Sixorish (talk) 03:46, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Can you make blank edits on all affected pages (items, creatures, NPCs and spells), so they update to the new template?

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 04:38, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Can you add the link to loot statistics back to Template:Infobox Creature?

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 07:34, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


I don't think I can purge them through the API because we're using an outdated MW version, and I think SixBot is being rate limited with purging manually, or maybe the server has too much work to do. I'll have a look later, since most pages won't need purging at all by the time I'm done.

I've added the loot statistics link back to the creatures. Let me know if it looks odd to you. -- Sixorish (talk) 08:02, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Thanks, it looks good.

Can you fix runsat?

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 08:15, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


What's wrong with it? -- Sixorish (talk) 08:18, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Oh, I was missing the message on Behavior section and didn't notice the Behavioral Properties. I have the feeling people will ignore a long list of properties. Maybe we should add some icons later?

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 08:24, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


I think people will eventually get accustomed to the list of properties, as long as it is organized. However, I've added the text back because I didn't mean to remove that. Also I adjusted the text that is displayed in the table when a "rough estimate" is provided instead of a value. -- Sixorish (talk) 08:40, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Looks really cool Sixorish! I created a feedback thread on tibia.com, here.

One thing I think could use a little improvement, are the weakness/strength % bars which show the percentage value. I like how they show in one glance the value because of their size, but it would be cool if they could somehow reprecent their element maybe? Or some other color tweak to show the gradient in values in colors (what you have in excel, where low values are red and high values green or something). I'm not sure what would look good. -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 09:30, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Thanks for adding it back, Six. Good idea about the feedback thread, Bennie. I've thought the same about the gradient bars. Other thing we could do is to show the differences from the original/base hit. All bars would have their origins aligned, bars going to the left would be positive differences (>100%), and bars going to the left would be negative differences (<100%). However, I don't think it would fit in the template.

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 09:47, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


One thing I would like point out is that the articles are missing in items' new flavourtexts. This results in lines such as "You see axe ring (axe fighting +4)." -- Wouterboy (talk) 13:27, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


@Bennie: I changed it to use +-% for the resistance bars. I'd like it if the properties table kept the absolute % (105% instead of +5%).

Regarding the colors: I think adding other colors will be an eyesore. I picked blue because it blends in well with the background and it's not too emphatic, but if we had green for earth and red for fire, it would distract the user from the other content and/or just generally feel out of place. You can try experimenting with colors if you want but I don't think it's a good idea.

@Hunter

A "whisker box"-type of thing would be really cool but probably a lot less understood than the current graph. -- Sixorish (talk) 13:31, January 21, 2015 (UTC)

@Wouterboy

Thanks. Those pages are meant to have article/actualname/plural but the "look" template is supposed to guess when it isn't provided. I'll fix that tomorrow probably.

-- Sixorish (talk) 13:31, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Concerning item articles and actual names, did you use the list of limited items to automatically add those parameters?

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 14:00, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


I haven't added article/actualname/plural to any items yet. According to TibiaWiki:Data/Item/article the only item to have article is Panda Teddy. -- Sixorish (talk) 14:07, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Sixorish, why is the effect parameter not included on Spell pages? Just a mistake or an idea? Maybe colored resistance bars are not so good, but something with those icons maybe? What about this: User:Bennie/resistances? -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 14:24, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Looks good Bennie, do you want to add it?

Also how is the background/border of the tabular data? -- Sixorish (talk) 14:29, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Ok, I added it. The border looks cool, the background color is too dark to comfortably read black text. A little lighter and then it'll be awesome. -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 14:42, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Are you guys aware of any monster that has a life drain damage modifier different from +0% and -100%? Some creatures used to be immune to life drain even before the implementation of damage modifiers. I wonder if they have really changed it or if it's still an immune or not-immune case.

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 14:55, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


NPC image on The Queen Of The Banshees (longest name I can think of) doesn't fit. #twbox-image max-width 64px can be removed to fix, but might push the title too much to the right. NPC images are kind of irregular because the names make the image dimensions non-standard. -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 15:17, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


I've removed the max-width/height from #twbox-image and added it to a.new descendents. I mostly wanted to limit the effects of missing orange image links to a 64x64px box. -- Sixorish (talk) 15:28, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Thanks. Another question, see Lou Toose. If buysell is set to no, the div id=npc-trades should not be displayed, right? But here it does. -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 15:40, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


Actually it is meant to be displayed, except NPCs who don't buy/sell anything should have "--" as their buy/sell. I wanted to be very clear and say: no there isn't missing information, this NPC really doesn't buy or sell anything. -- Sixorish (talk) 15:47, January 21, 2015 (UTC)


I added a very small script to common.js which will sort the creature resistances from highest to lowest when the document is loaded. Is this better? I didn't want to at first because I was afraid the random positioning would be awkward. -- Sixorish (talk) 02:29, January 22, 2015 (UTC)


I don't think the sorting is really needed, with no sorting viewers can get used to always see fire as 4th bar for example. With sorting you'll always look at the top bar and then look which element it is.

I do like the ideas proposed on tibia.com by Olixin but also Waverly, to have the resistance bars go left or right from a fixed point, denoting weak or strong. I still sometimes confuse if + or - is weak or strong, having this left or right by default would be useful. What do you think? -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 11:59, January 22, 2015 (UTC)


I think there are a few issues with this:

  • I think the bar being far from its label will cause readability issues.
  • In such a graph we would still need to label which side is strong and which side is weak. This is why I prefer "absolute" percentages like 105% over relative percentages like +5%. If the main reason for preferring the outward-moving graph is because it's intuitive then it will be no more intuitive than if we colored bars red/green (for 99%- and 100%+) because that's the only "intuitive" feature of the graph.
  • Strong to is bound to 100% (immune at 100% resistance) while weak to is unbound. Since we work in a limited space we would use percentages to determine where the center (0) is. I don't think it will be intuitive at all if 0 is not near the center as it would be for many stronger creatures.

-- Sixorish (talk) 12:34, January 22, 2015 (UTC)


Mm okay. One other thing Creature Artworks are removed from the creature infobox. I kinda liked them, can they come back? -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 13:53, January 23, 2015 (UTC)


I'll work out a place we can put it. I think it will go nicely in the notes next to the tibia.com description of pages. -- Sixorish (talk) 07:25, January 24, 2015 (UTC)


Ok cool. Some stuff:

  • droppedby is literally included with 3 curly brackets if empty, e.g. Fireball Rune
  • The related items section lists give a dpl warning if no results are found (noresultsheader could be filled)

-- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 22:18, January 25, 2015 (UTC)


Is there a way you could add some 'special' u-words to the template to be recognised as needing the 'a' as article (for items such as Used Candelabrum and Unity Charm)? The template isn't doing this yet, I noticed. Also, do all plurals need to be supplied manually? -- Wouterboy (talk) 10:52, January 27, 2015 (UTC)


This information is stored on the item pages now, it's easier that way. I had User:SixBot add article, actualname and plural params to the item pages automatically, using educated guesses as to their value (except plural which I didn't set yet, because I'm not sure how the plurals should work). -- Sixorish (talk) 11:18, January 27, 2015 (UTC)


Re: concept art - what is the plan if in the future a creature is depicted in multiple creature artworks? The old method tested if a certain filename existed which wouldn't work if there were multiple. -- Sixorish (talk) 17:24, January 29, 2015 (UTC)


We have a similar case with Yalaharian Outfits. There are 3 outfit cards for the same outfit. {{Infobox Outfit}} makes we manually add artworks. But I don't think it's an elegant solution.

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 23:41, January 29, 2015 (UTC)

Outfiter

Hey!

Could you guys change ids of 3 mounts into names in Outfiter? I have seen it has been updated, but they remain untouched. I assume it would require only: Replacing 685 with Shadow_Hart, 686 with Black_Stag and 687 with Emperor_Deer in Outfiter/Code_Template & Outfiter/Code plus renaming pages/editing first lines(just id values) here - 685, here - 686 and here - 687. --Cauli92 (talk) 15:48, January 22, 2015 (UTC)


I renamed the 3 pages but not sure if deleting and creating them fresh is necessary or not. They are not loading in the 3 browsers i tried, but that happened last time i added an outfit so we shall see when the server catches up. --DM ><((°> Contribs <°))>< talk to me 03:32, January 23, 2015 (UTC)


It seems to be working correctly now, thanks a lot! -- Cauli92 (talk) 15:41, January 23, 2015 (UTC)


Note that the id on each page had to be changed from the number to the name (e.g. 686 > Black_Stag), as done by Sixorish. --DM ><((°> Contribs <°))>< talk to me 17:23, January 24, 2015 (UTC)


Hey, I know, I did mention that in my first message about it, it's right after renaming the pages. -- Cauli92 (talk) 18:01, January 24, 2015 (UTC)

Updates/8.54

Can you guys check what's wrong with Updates/8.54? On Monobook, the logo is misplaced and there's that "Node-count limit exceeded" error. On Wikia skin, it doesn't even load after last edit.

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 15:00, January 23, 2015 (UTC)


Um, I didn't think this would cause a problem. Apparently the new templates on our pages (Template:Dropped By and Template:Loot Table) are adding a lot of preprocessor nodes and it stops expanding templates when that limit has been exceeded... I'll have a look at it tomorrow. -- Sixorish (talk) 16:30, January 23, 2015 (UTC)


I'm honestly confused here. On User:Sixorish/bottleneck/items I tested this and the current revision "fixes" the problem by changing how DPL collects the data. If you use a phantom template (Template:Infobox Item/Update) it adds almost no preprocessor nodes whereas if you instruct DPL to get the data itself using Template:DPLPARM Item.include it uses more than the server can handle. -- Sixorish (talk) 06:08, January 24, 2015 (UTC)


I've applied the changes to the DPL parameter templates for items. The page limits are now at:

<!-- 
NewPP limit report
Preprocessor node count: 32543/300000
Post‐expand include size: 140941/2097152 bytes
Template argument size: 34845/2097152 bytes
Expensive parser function count: 0/100
-->

However, this update page takes a lot of time to render. Not sure if it was like that before. It might just be because that update introduced a lot of things. -- Sixorish (talk) 07:28, January 24, 2015 (UTC)


Mm, it is fast enough for me. Btw, the arena bosses (and probably all creatures with no loot have an empty Template:Loot Table in their loot parameter. E.g. Menace. Maybe fill it with two dashes and display "No loot." or something instead? -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 10:51, January 24, 2015 (UTC)


It's fast when rendering after it's been cached. But update pages are meant to be edited a lot (mostly before/shortly after they're released) so I'd like to think performance when editing is a big deal. -- Sixorish (talk) 11:07, January 24, 2015 (UTC)


As for the "No loot." thing, I will add a message for the time being. In the future I'd like to code something to make adding loot easier: a JS-based loot adder/remover which is why I wanted all creatures to have {{Loot Table}}. But for the time being we have other things to work on. -- Sixorish (talk) 11:12, January 24, 2015 (UTC)


The same error is happening on List of Creatures.

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 23:39, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

TibiaWiki:Data

Hi guys,

Does anyone here have any interest in using TibiaWiki:Data?

These pages contain static data from our templates and is updated by User:SixBot. I've also added a tabular version which can be found by appending "/table" to page names (I may not update the tabular versions as often because it takes a bit longer).

These pages could be used for fast verification of the validity of our pages, for example I found and fixed this problem after checking the data.

Basically it's a quicker way to check the values of a lot of parameters. Each page contains data for 1 parameter (I don't think people want to download the entire wiki's data for just 2 pieces of info).

Here are some data pages for example:

  • TibiaWiki:Data/Item/npcvalue, and /table.
  • TibiaWiki:Data/Item/sellto, and /table.

This combination of data could be used for Calculators#Loot, currently it uses a parsed version of a DPL list which is time-consuming to update. Of course it has applications. But does anyone actually have an interest in using it? If so then I can write some help pages & add the script to get this data to Common.js. Since I'll be studying in February I won't have a lot of time to use it myself, so, if nobody else wants to use it I just won't update it. -- Sixorish (talk) 12:55, January 24, 2015 (UTC)


I don't think I'll use that in the near future, but the possibility looks promising! Good luck with your studying ;) -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 12:07, January 25, 2015 (UTC)


It seems promising, indeed.

By the way, have you guys noticed that Calculators#Armor isn't working properly?

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 00:26, January 26, 2015 (UTC)


Hm, I thought it was just the images but the whole thing is broken. Well, I fixed the images which was bugged because of a Wikia change to image URLs, and I'll look at the rest of it when I have some more time. -- Sixorish (talk) 02:54, January 26, 2015 (UTC)

More bot edits

SixBot is currently editing every item page with a single itemid to add the following parameters:

  • sprites
  • holdsliquid (if fluid container)
  • immobile (if immobile)
  • hangable (if hangable)
  • unshootable (if blocks missiles)
  • blockspath (if blocks path)
  • walkable (if walkable)
  • usable (if usable)
  • rotatable (if rotatable)
  • mapcolor (if has map color)

He will also check and fix anything else that is verifiable on the dat, like stackable and lightcolor/radius. -- Sixorish (talk) 14:46, January 27, 2015 (UTC)


Due to a bug SixBot wasn't adding or fixing some parameters, like usable. I've also added some checks, e.g. SixBot will remove hangable if it is not hangable, remove volume if it is not a container, and others. He'll also be adding a new parameter, marketable, to all items. -- Sixorish (talk) 13:00, January 29, 2015 (UTC)


Had to stop SixBot to check out a possible bug.

  • Scroll has the wrong itemid. (should be 2815)

Will resume editing and fix this one later. -- Sixorish (talk) 13:10, January 29, 2015 (UTC)


Yeah, 347 is Scroll (TBI)'s ID.

Hunter of Dragoes (Talk · Contribs · Admins) - 13:19, January 29, 2015 (UTC)


Updating Data/Item/* and rerunning the script to fix some bugs that occurred before.

  • Readable is gone. Writable (wiki) = readable (dat reader), rewritable (wiki) = writable (dat reader), I didn't realize this.
  • Fixing errors caused by assuming readable, writable and rewritable were separate.
  • Anything else that the bot picks up that it missed before.

-- Sixorish (talk) 08:47, January 30, 2015 (UTC)


What an odd word "marketable", I didn't know it really existed. But it's cool you're adding it, I would be interested in a list of items which can't be traded on the market. -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 09:13, January 30, 2015 (UTC)


Marketable means something other than what we're using for, but it's understandable. If we decide something else is better it can be changed, but for now, no reason to stall edits just because something may not be perfect.

I think I am done with mass edits for the time being. Here are some things I'd like to do in the future though:

  • Order parameters within the source of pages (there are a lot of new parameters).
  • Merge items and objects.
  • Fix any inconsistent parameter spacing.
  • Create rules for parameters, e.g. armor can only be a number, and generate regular reports of invalid parameters so that we can find potential issues.
  • Upload files with "Item ID x.gif" for all item IDs, as a reference to upload a file under Item Name.gif

I will run the script maybe once a week or on request to update any info with changes/added IDs. So, if you go looking for IDs, feel free to save time by ignoring things that can be obtained from the dat.

-- Sixorish (talk) 09:47, January 30, 2015 (UTC)

Creature Descriptions

Errors:

  • ...

Hi,

I will add creature descriptions to our pages taken from tibia.com; however, since they don't have the same naming conventions as we do for the website, there are likely to be a few errors in my automatic guesses. I would appreciate if anyone could scan the list for errors. -- Sixorish (talk) 10:32, January 31, 2015 (UTC)


I... I don't really know what you mean. I hope this is helpful:

Errors:

  • cultacolyte (instead of 'acolyteofthecult');
  • frogazure (instead of 'azurefrog');
  • wraith (instead of 'betrayedwraith');
  • butterflypurple (instead of 'butterflies');
  • charlatan (instead of 'corymcharlatan');
  • skirmisher (instead of 'corymskirmisher');
  • vanguard (instead of 'corymvanguard');
  • cultpriest (instead of 'enlightenedofthecult');
  • lostdwarfbasher (instead of 'lostbasher');
  • lostdwarfhusher (instead of 'losthusher');
  • earthelementalmassive (instead of 'massiveearthelemental');
  • energyelementalmassive (instead of 'massiveenergyelemental');
  • hellfireelemental (instead of 'massivefireelemental');
  • waterelementalmassive (instead of 'massivewaterelemental');
  • cultadept (instead of 'adeptofthecult');
  • cultnovice (instead of 'noviceofthecult');
  • seacrest (instead of 'seacrestserpent');
  • viscountmanbat (instead of 'viciousmanbat');
  • wormpriest (instead of 'wormpriestess').

Also:

  • In the list of butterflies in the first column the Purple Butterfly is excluded.
  • The Novice of the Cult is listed twice (the first time followed by 'cultadept', and the second time by 'cultnovice'.
  • Perhaps change 'Enraged Crystal Golems' in the second column to 'Crystal Golems'?
  • The plural of 'Enlightened of the Cult' should simply be 'Enlightened of the Cult'.
Advertisement