Talk:Updates/10.8

Oddity
Uhmm... does anyone know why the Thick-Skinned achievement is displayed as 'Think-Skinned'? It's spelled correctly, and it even shows the right information... --Wouterboy (talk) 15:09, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

Should work fine now. Great job adding all of the achievements.

Cauli92 (talk) 15:14, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

Ugh, I'm a dumbass. Thanks for fixing that. Oh, and also: one secret achievement still needs to be discovered! -- Wouterboy (talk) 15:18, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

Runes
moved from Talk:Avalanche Rune (Strong)

I'd rather call such items 'Self-Made' instead of 'Strong'. -- Wouterboy (talk) 14:41, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

All right, it's up to discussion. I decided to just make one and was about to make a Talk page about it myself. Personally I don't like self-made as they can be made by anyone, so Cipsoft's feature name is a bit misleading.

Cipsoft has replaced old runes with new ones, so new ones have old IDs and 'old' runes are technically completely new, so I'd propose doing it like that:

Copy old template of one rune, keep both pages: XXXX Rune

and

XXXX Rune (Strong)

First one(Weakened): ''This article is about XXXX Runes bought from shop or looted. For the player-made variation check XXXX Rune (Strong)'' < /noinclude>
 * Add
 * Leave implemented as it is?
 * Change SpriteID
 * Done

Second one(Strong): ''This article is about Avalanche Rune made by players. For the spell to create them, see Avalanche. For the variation bought in shops, check Avalanche Rune.'' < /noinclude>
 * Add
 * Add (Strong) at the and of a name, add | actualname
 * Add 12 Sprites ID with 100ms delays(Or can a bot do that?)
 * Change implemented to 10.8
 * Delete NPC price and Buyfrom

Does it fly with everyone? Do you have any suggestions?

Thanks in advance,

Cauli92 (talk) 14:52, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

Version number
The version number is 10.80, not 10.8. We should update all old references that point to 10.8.
 * — Mathias (profile, talk) 07:06, June 25, 2015 (UTC)

Don't do such big updates on your own, especially if you use VisualEditor, whole page was ruined by it and no image was displayed, also admins can rename old pages and keep logs instead of adding brand new pages, so next time please just mention it on the Talk page and wait for some experienced Admin to verify the whole thing.

Cauli92 (talk) 07:20, June 25, 2015 (UTC)

Possibly someone would be able to make some sort of exception that would read 10.8 as 10.80 and therefore, we might be able to avoid editing so many pages separately.

Cauli92 (talk) 07:24, June 25, 2015 (UTC)

Although you are technically correct Mathias, we always used numbers without zeros added in the past. Changing this is possible, but requires quite some editing and possible bugs when this is forgotten at some pages. So let's keep it 10.8 for now, is that ok with you? -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 07:27, June 25, 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, was just about to comment that. We have always done it without zeroes at the end, and created categories based on it etc. -- Wouterboy (talk) 07:30, June 25, 2015 (UTC)